Discover our exclusive information
about the corruption and fraud of
RAMIN ISAYEV (RAMIN ALI HAKAN)
Check out detailed information and evidence of Isayev’s crimes of fraud and money laundering.
We provide detailed commentary on the trial and updates from Ramin’s case hearing.
Discover how the former SOCAR-AQS CEO misused company funds for a lavish lifestyle.
As the former CEO of SOCAR AQS, Isayev’s alleged criminal activities have not only captivated the nation but also raised significant questions about corporate governance and accountability in Azerbaijan’s business landscape.
The investigation into Ramin Isayev began with allegations of embezzlement linked to a loan of 16 million manats from the International Bank of Azerbaijan, which was issued between 2012 and 2014 for a company associated with the Baghlan Group.
Following his arrest on July 29, 2024, Isayev was charged with multiple offenses, including embezzlement and money laundering, as the scope of his alleged crimes expanded to include significant financial misconduct during his tenure at SOCAR AQS.
Isayev’s alleged criminal activities included the establishment of shell companies registered under relatives’ names. These companies provided goods and services to SOCAR AQS at inflated prices, resulting in substantial financial losses for the company.
One notable scheme involved leasing land at exorbitant rates, which led to millions of manats in losses. Furthermore, Isayev is accused of manipulating financial reports to conceal his crimes, including falsifying documents for projects abroad1.
The investigation revealed that Isayev engaged in various fraudulent activities to bolster his personal wealth. For instance, he impersonated reputable brands by renaming a company to Baker Energy, exploiting its name for personal gain.
He also conspired with international associates to transfer embezzled funds through complex financial networks involving Chinese companies1.
Isayev reportedly misused company funds for personal ventures, including funding his education at prestigious institutions like MIT and making donations that were falsely presented as personal contributions. Notably, he made significant donations to Harvard Kennedy School using company resources, aiming to enhance his business credentials.
This misuse extended to hiring practices where over thirty relatives were employed at inflated salaries without appropriate qualifications or roles.
The ramifications of Isayev’s actions extend beyond SOCAR AQS. His previous employment at KCA Deutag ended in controversy due to his inability to perform assigned tasks, leading to threats against company officials when his contract was not renewed.
The ongoing trial has highlighted systemic issues within corporate governance in Azerbaijan and raised awareness about the need for stricter oversight and accountability measures in both public and private sectors.
As the trial progresses, it is anticipated that further details will emerge regarding Isayev’s extensive criminal network and the implications for other businesses in Azerbaijan. The case has already prompted discussions about reforming corporate governance practices to prevent similar occurrences in the future.
The Azerbaijani public has been closely following the developments in this high-profile case. The revelations about Isayev’s lavish lifestyle funded by embezzled money have sparked outrage and calls for greater transparency in corporate operations. The trial is seen as a critical test for the judicial system’s ability to address corruption at high levels.
The unfolding story of Ramin Isayev serves as a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities within corporate structures and the potential for abuse when accountability measures are lacking. As this case continues to develop, it will undoubtedly influence public perception of corporate ethics in Azerbaijan and potentially lead to significant reforms aimed at enhancing transparency and integrity within business practices.
Ramin Isayev’s trial not only sheds light on individual wrongdoing but also opens up broader discussions about corruption, governance, and ethical standards in Azerbaijan’s corporate environment. The outcome of this case could have lasting implications for how businesses operate within the country and how they are held accountable for their actions.